- レコメンド
April 14th, 2023:
Looking back at this, I feel really nice that I got to improve.
For those wondering, there is only one sound from another BMS used, it's the kick.
The repeating melodies are presets made by LMMS (or at least I remember it being there).
Same with the vocals, those are taken from the internet.
In short: This was my first BMS ever produced and I failed miserably lol.
I've improved a lot since.
Thanks for playing though lmao.
_________________________
August 8th, 2022:
My first ever BMS work created.
I hope you enjoy it!
Echa /
作者Webサイト: https://twitter.com/echa_omega /
登録: 2022年08月08日(月) 06:27 /
編集: 2023年04月14日(金) 15:57 /
区分: オリジナル /
管理: 編集
No.
- Mowl
- レス (0件)
I try to understand as much as possible about what the artist wants to do and find the good points, no matter how bad others may say the work is.
However, with this work, it's difficult to even understand what it is fundamentally trying to do, which makes it extremely difficult to even look for good points anymore.
First of all, regarding the audio quotes from past BMSs, there is no necessity and they are simply placed haphazardly, lacking respect for the original artists.
I have listened to a variety of music that uses sampling, but I can honestly say that I have never heard sampled music where the meaning of each individual sound is so close to nothing.
Also, from the perspective of building one's own music by randomly piling on top of each other, this music honestly lacks intensity.
I'm not saying that this approach is bad, of course. I just feel that this approach is futile because we cannot see what the final attempt is going to be.
Secondly, the music score is also out of tune with the BPM, and while I found this a bit interesting, I can't see the intent in any way, so I have to suspect a mistake first and foremost.
If you are trying to create such an inconsistent score, the song should be intense first (precedent: MARENOL).
Even if the music is not that intense, the meaning of the score should be consistent.
Finally, BGI, to be honest, does not seem to make any sense at all, since the previous elements are out of order.
Frankly, it's a waste.
If there is one thing to praise about this work, it is the stylishness of the back.bmp and BGI, but it's also quite unconvincing and seems to show the bad side of this work no matter how hard you try.
As I said a little at the beginning, I try to read the artist's intention as much as possible.
However, in the case of this work, no matter how many times I played it, I could not read the author's intention, and even if I did, I had the impression that it ended up being a half-baked work.
I would have originally given every work even one point, but sorry, even that value is not found in me.
Please note that I'm not accusing you of anything, sorry.
P.S.
If this is your first work, I think you should be exposed to more other pieces, do some analysis, and acquire a vocabulary.
0/10
レスを投稿する
ひとつのインプレに対して複数件の返信を投稿できます。
Q. 注意事項はありますか？
- 一度投稿したレスは削除できません。
- ただし、投稿内容の編集は可能です。
- 不適切な投稿内容は断りなく修正・削除を行います。